The framework of syntactic analysis developed by Izre'el (2018, 2020) situates the simplest structure found in spoken data - the unipartite clause - at the core of its model. The implementation of this framework for the analysis of existential constructions in Modern Hebrew (Izre'el 2022) demonstrates how the unipartite analysis on presumably sentential structures allows us to remodel and bypass former research question, providing a new perspective and novel answers. This contribution attempts to follow up on this analysis and develop it further in an interactional, dynamic perspective. I propose that the discussed framework would additionally benefit from dispensing with other traditional models, which similarly originate in the bipartite view of sentence structure. Shifting away from categories of Information Structure and from the partitioning of information into topic vs. comment/focus and predicate can advance our understanding of language and discourse, while avoiding the pitfalls of problematic and poorly definable concepts. In this view, interlocutors do not structure their contributions or interpret others’ speech by identifying topics, comments, foci, or predicates. Instead, they navigate through the interactive discourse relying on low-level local communicative instructions which signal attention requirements, relevance, local discourse moves, interactionally structured discourse relations, epistemic management, emotive stance and more. Situating the analysis in the dynamic perspective of online syntax opens the way to a more refined understanding of the data, and further research questions.
Ariel, Mira. 1990. Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.
Auer, Peter, and Yael Maschler. 2013. ‘Discourse or Grammar? VS Patterns in Spoken Hebrew and Spoken German Narratives’. Language Sciences 37: 147–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.08.005.
Davis, Wayne A. 2007. Implicature: Intention, Convention, and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory. Reissue edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Endriss, Cornelia. 2009. Quantificational Topics a Scopal Treatment of Exceptional Wide Scope Phenomena. Dordrecht: Springer.
Enfield, NJ, and Jack Sidnell. 2017. The Concept of Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1997. The Dynamics of Focus Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Garassino, Davide, and Daniel Jacob, eds. 2022. When Data Challenges Theory. Linguistik Aktuell 273. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Grzech, Karolina. 2020. ‘Epistemic Primacy, Common Ground Management and Epistemic Perspective’. In Evidentiality, Egophoricity, and Engagement, by Henrik Bergqvist and Seppo Kittilä, 23–60. Studies in Diversity Linguistics 30. Berlin: Language Science Press. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3975797.
Holler, Judith, and Stephen C. Levinson. 2019. ‘Multimodal Language Processing in Human Communication’. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 23 (8): 639–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.05.006.
Izre’el, Shlomo. 2012. ‘Basic Sentence Structures: A View from Spoken Israeli Hebrew.’ In Penser Les Langues Avec Claire Blanche-Benveniste, edited by Sandrine Caddéo, Marie-Noëlle Roubaud, Magali Rouquier, and Frédéric Sabio, 215–27. Aix-en-Provence: Publications de l’Université de Provence.
Izre’el, Shlomo. 2018. ‘Unipartite Clauses: A View from Spoken Israeli Hebrew’. In Afroasiatic: Data and Perspectives, edited by Mauro Tosco and Mauro Tosco, 235–59. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 339. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Izre’el, Shlomo. 2020. ‘The Basic Unit of Spoken Language and the Interface Between Prosody, Discourse and Syntax: A View from Spontaneous Spoken Hebrew’. In In Search of a Reference Unit for Speech: A Corpus-Driven Approach, edited by Shlomo Izre’el, Mello Heliana, Alessandro Panunzi, and Tommaso Raso, 77–105. Studies in Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Izre’el, Shlomo. 2022. ‘The Syntax of Existential Constructions: The Spoken Israeli Hebrew Perspective’. Journal of Speech Sciences 11: e022001–e022001. https://doi.org/10.20396/joss.v11i00.16181.
Jary, Mark. 2010. Assertion. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Krifka, Manfred. 2008. ‘Basic Notions of Information Structure’. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55 (3–4): 243–276.
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Laury, Ritva, Tsuyoshi Ono, and Ryoko Suzuki. 2019. ‘Questioning the Clause as a Crosslinguistic Unit in Grammar and Interaction’. Studies in Language 43 (2): 364–401. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.17032.lau.
Linell, Per. 2013. ‘The Dynamics of Incrementation in Utterance-Building: Processes and Resources’. In Units of Talk: Units of Action, edited by Beatrice Szczepek Reed and Geoffrey Raymond, 57–90. Studies in Language and Social Interaction 25. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Matić, Dejan. 2022. ‘Alternatives to Information Structure’. In When Data Challenges Theory. Non-Prototypical, Unexpected and Paradoxical Evidence in the Field of Information Structure, edited by Davide Garassino and Daniel Jacob, 91–111. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Matić, Dejan, and Daniel Wedgwood. 2013. ‘The Meanings of Focus: The Significance of an Interpretation-Based Category in Cross-Linguistic Analysis’. Journal of Linguistics 49 (1): 127–163. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226712000345.
O’Madagain, Cathal, and Michael Tomasello. 2021. ‘Joint Attention to Mental Content and the Social Origin of Reasoning’. Synthese 198 (5): 4057–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02327-1.
Ozerov, Pavel. 2018. ‘Tracing the Sources of Information Structure: Towards the Study of Interactional Management of Information’. Journal of Pragmatics 138: 77–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.08.017.
Ozerov, Pavel. 2019. ‘This Is Not an Interrogative: The Prosody of “Wh-Questions” in Hebrew and the Sources of Their Questioning and Rhetorical Interpretations’. Language Sciences 72: 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2018.12.004.
Ozerov, Pavel. 2021. ‘Multifactorial Information Management: Summing up the Emerging Alternative to Information Structure’. Linguistics Vanguard 7 (1): 2020039.
Pekarek Doehler, Simona, Yael Maschler, Leelo Keevallik, and Jan Lindström. 2020. ‘Complex Syntax-in-Interaction: Emergent and Emerging Clause-Combining Patterns for Organizing Social Actions’. In Emergent Syntax for Conversation: Clausal Patterns and the Organization of Action, edited by Yael Maschler, Simona Pekarek Doehler, Jan Lindström, and Leelo Keevallik, 1–24. Studies in Language and Social Interaction 32. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slsi.32.01doe.
Pekarek-Doehler, Simona, Elwys De Stefani, and Anne-Sylvie Horlacher. 2015. Time and Emergence in Grammar: Dislocation, Topicalization and Hanging Topic in French Talk-in-Interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 1995. ‘“Theticity” and VS Order: A Case Study’. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 48 (1–2): 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.19220.127.116.11.
Sax, Daniel J. 2011. ‘Sentence Stress and the Procedures of Comprehension’. In Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives, edited by Victoria Escandell-Vidal, Michael Leonetti, and Aoife Ahern, 25:347–81. Current Research in the Semantics / Pragmatics Interface. Bingley: Emerald.
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1996. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Steedman, Mark. 2000. ‘Information Structure and the Syntax-Phonology Interface’. Linguistic Inquiry 31 (4): 649–685.
Steensig, Jakob, and Trine Heinemann. 2012. ‘When “Yes” Is Not Enough – as an Answer to a Yes/No Question’. In Units of Talk - Units of Action, edited by Beatrice Szczepek Reed and Geoffrey Raymond, 207–42. Studies in Language and Social Interaction 25. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/slsi.25.07ste.
Thompson, Sandra A. 2019. ‘Understanding “Clause” as an Emergent “Unit” in Everyday Conversation’. Studies in Language 43 (2): 254–80. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.16032.tho.
Tomlin, Russell S. 1997. ‘Mapping Conceptual Representations into Linguistic Representations: The Role of Attention in Grammar’. In Language and Conceptualization, edited by Eric Pederson and Jan Nuyts, 162–89. Language Culture and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139086677.007.
von der Gabelentz, Georg. 1869. ‘Ideen zu einer vergleichenden Syntax’. Zeitschrift Für Völkerpsychologie Und Sprachwissenschaft 6: 376–84.
von Heusinger, Klaus. 2002. ‘Information Structure and the Partition of Sentence Meaning’. In Prague Linguistic Circle Papers, edited by Eva Hajičová, Jiri Hana, Petr Sgall, and Thomas Hoskovec, 4:275–309. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Yliniemi, Juha. 2021. ‘Similarity of Mirative and Contrastive Focus: Three Parameters for Describing Attention Markers’. Linguistic Typology pp. 000010151520200134. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2020-0134.
Zimmermann, Malte, and Edgar Onea. 2011. ‘Focus Marking and Focus Interpretation’. Lingua 121 (11): 1651–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2011.06.002.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Pavel Ozerov