Abstract
The aim of the article is to present and discuss the different proposals for overcoming the classic dichotomy between external analyzes and internal readings of cultural products present in the works of Pierre Bourdieu (The rules of art) and Norbert Elias (Mozart, sociology of a genius).
References
ALTAMIRANO, Carlos e SARLO, Beatriz. Literatura/Sociedad. Buenos Aires: Edicial S. A., 1993.
BOURDIEU, Pierre. Les règles de l’art: genèse et structure du champ littéraire. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1992.
CHARTIER, Roger. “Formation sociale et économie psychique: la societé de cour dans le procès de civilisation”. In: ELIAS, Norbert. La société de cour. Manchecourt, França: Flammarion, 2005.
ELIAS, Norbert. Os estabelecidos e os outsiders. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Jorge Zahar, 2000.
ELIAS, Norbert. Mozart, sociologia de um gênio. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Jorge Zahar, 1995.
ELIAS, Norbert. O processo civilizador. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Jorge Zahar, 1994, 2 vols.
KANT, Immanuel. Crítica da faculdade do juízo. Rio de Janeiro: Forense Universitária, 2005.
LAHIRE, Bernard. “Champ, hors-champ, contrechamp”. In: ______. (Org.). Le travail sociologique de Pierre Bourdieu: dettes e critiques. Paris: La Découverte, 2001.
MICELI, Sergio. “Norbert Elias e a questão da determinação”. In: WAIZBORT, Leopoldo (Org.). Dossiê Norbert Elias. São Paulo, SP: Edusp, 2001.
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2013 Guilherme Seto Monteiro