Keywords
Raciality
Capitalism
How to Cite
Abstract
I intend to reflect to what extent Vivek Chibber's criticism of Indian subordinate studies is valid for thinking about the theoretical contributions of Peruvian sociologist Aníbal Quijano. A question will be fundamental to think of the so-called decolonial phase of Quijano: Like subaltern studies, Quijano proposes an explanation of the singularity of capitalist development in the periphery, for Indians subalternity is a central concept for understanding colonial and post-Independence India, for Quijano, raciality is crucial to understanding Latin American capitalism and the formation of states in this region, what are the affinities and differences between the two concepts?
References
ASTON, T. H.; PHILPIN, H. E. (Eds.).The Brenner Debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
BALLESTRIN, Luciana. América Latina e o giro decolonial. In: Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, n. 11. Brasília, p. 89-117, maio-agosto de 2013.
BRENNER, R. Merchants and Revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.
CHAKRABARTY, D. Provincializing Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.
CHAKRABARTY, D. Rethinking working-class history: Bengal 1890-1940. Princeton: Princeton University press, 1989.
CHATTERJEE, P. Nationalist thought and the colonial world: a derivative discourse? London: Zed Press, 1986.
CHIBBER, Vivek. Postcolonial theory and the specter of capital. London: Verso, 2013.
CHIBBER, Vivek. Capitalism, class and universalism. In: Socialist Register, v. 50, 2014.
CONNEL, Raewyn. Southern theory: the global dynamics of knowledge in social science. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007.
GUHA, R. On some aspects of the historiography of colonial India. In: GUHA (ed.). Subaltern Studies I: Writings on South Asian History & Society. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1982.
GUHA, R. Elementary Aspects of peasant insurgency in colonial India. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1983.
GUHA, R. Dominance without Hegemony. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997.
MARX, Karl. O capital, livro I, v. 1. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 2008.
QUIJANO, A. Colonialidad y Modernidad-Racionalidade. In: Bonilla, Heraclio. Los Conquistados: 1492 y la población indígena de las Américas. Bogotá: Tercer Mundo, 1992.
QUIJANO, A. El fantasma del desarrollo en América Latina. In: Rev. Venez. de Econ. y Ciencias Sociales, vol. 6 Nº 2 (mayo-agosto), p. 73-90, 2000.
QUIJANO, A. Colonialidade, poder, globalização e democracia. In: Novos rumos, ano 17, n. 37, 2002.
QUIJANO, A. Colonialidade do poder, eurocentrismo e América Latina. In: Lander, Edgardo (org.). A colonialidade do saber: eurocentrismo e ciências sociais. Perspectivas latino-americanas. Colección Sur Sur. Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 2005.
QUIJANO, A. Dependencia, cambio social y urbanización en Latinoamérica. In: CLÍMACO, D (org.). Cuestiones y Horizontes: de la dependencia historico-estrutural a la colonialidad/descolonialidad del poder. Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 2014a.
QUIJANO, A. “Polo marginal” y “mano de obra marginal”. In: CLÍMACO, D (org.). Cuestiones y Horizontes: de la dependencia historico-estrutural a la colonialidad/descolonialidad del poder. Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 2014b.
QUIJANO, A. Sobre la natureza actual de la crisis del capitalismo. CLÍMACO, D (org.) Cuestiones y Horizontes: de la dependencia historico-estrutural a la colonialidad/descolonialidad del poder. Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 2014c.
QUIJANO, A. América Latina en la economía mundial. CLÍMACO, D (org.) Cuestiones y Horizontes: de la dependencia historico-estrutural a la colonialidad/descolonialidad del poder. Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 2014d.
QUIJANO, A. Del “polo marginal” a la “economía alternativa”. CLÍMACO, D (org.) Cuestiones y Horizontes: de la dependencia historico-estrutural a la colonialidad/descolonialidad del poder. Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 2014e.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2015 Lucas Trindade da Silva
