Keywords
Prosodic functions
Focus
Sentence modality
Mandarin
English
How to Cite
Abstract
In this paper we address the long-standing issue of how prosodic patterns are linked to meanings. We explore the idea that prosodically realized communicative functions, such as focus and sentence modality, are analogous to lexical morphemes, the smallest sound units that carry meaning. We considered evidence of a four-way similarity between lexical morphemes and prosodic functions. First, similar to lexical morphemes, each prosodic function consists of multiple phonetic components. Second, like segmental phonemes, individual prosodic components are meaningless themselves, but act jointly to mark both intraand inter-functional contrasts. Third, like lexical morphemes, prosodic functions have allomorph-like variants whose occurrences are conditioned by factors like location in sentence and interaction with other prosodic functions. Finally, similar to lexical morphemes, prosodic functions are language-specific and the specificity has likely historical sources. We examined the evidence by a) reviewing existing literature on speech prosody, b) conducting two new experiments on the production of focus and sentence modality in General American English and Mandarin Chinese, and c) training an articulatory-functional model on focus, modality, tone and stress in English and Mandarin, and synthesizing fully-detailed F0 contours with the learned functional targets. Overall, all the evidence examined is in support of the hypothesis. In particular, the consistency between the target parameters obtained from acoustic analysis and computational modeling, and the close match between functionally synthesized and naturally produced F0 contours demonstrate the plausibility of establishing a clear link between function-specific categorical representations and fine-detailed surface prosody.
References
Ladd DR. Intonational phonology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
Bolinger D. Intonation and Its Uses -- Melody in Grammar and Discourse, Stanford, California: Stanford University Press; 1989.
Gussenhoven C. Intonation and interpretation: Phonetics and Phonology In: Proceedings of The 1st International Conference on Speech Prosody, Aix-en-Provence, France, 2002. 47-57.
Gussenhoven C. The Phonology of Tone and Intonation: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
Hirschberg J. Communication and prosody: Functional aspects of prosody. Speech Commun. 2002;36:31-43.
Hirschberg J. Pragmatics and intonation. In: LR Horn and GL Ward, editors. The Handbook of Pragmatics, Oxford: Blackwell, 2004. p. 515-37.
Liberman MY. The intonational system of English [Ph.D. Dissertation]. M.I.T.; 1975.
Pierrehumbert J and Hirschberg J. The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In: PR Cohen, J Morgan and ME Pollack, editors. Intentions in Communication, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1990. p. 271-311.
Steedman M. Information Structure and the Syntax-Phonology Interface. Ling. Inq. 2000;31:649-89.
Xu Y. Speech melody as articulatorily implemented communicative functions. Speech Commun. 2005;46:220-51.
Spencer A. Morphological theory: An introduction to word structure in generative grammar, Oxford: Blackwell; 1991.
Cooper WE, Eady SJ and Mueller PR. Acoustical aspects of contrastive stress in question-answer contexts. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1985;77:2142-56.
Breen M, Fedorenko E, Wagner M and Gibson E. Acoustic correlates of information structure. Language and Cognitive Processes 2010;25:1044-98.
Pell MD. Influence of emotion and focus on prosody in matched statements and questions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2001;109:1668-80.
Heldner M. On the reliability of overall intensity and spectral emphasis as acoustic correlates of focal accents in Swedish. J. Phonetics 2003;31:39–62.
Xu Y and Xu CX. Phonetic realization of focus in English declarative intonation. J. Phonetics 2005;33:159-97.
Eady SJ and Cooper WE. Speech intonation and focus location in matched statements and questions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1986;80:402-16.
Rialland A. African “lax” question prosody: its realisations and its geographical distribution. Lingua 2009;119:928-49.
Xu Y, Chen S-w and Wang B. Prosodic focus with and without post-focus compression (PFC): A typological divide within the same language family? The Linguistic Review 2012;29:131-47.
Bolinger D. Intonation across languages. In: JH Greenberg, editors. Universals of human language, Phonology V. 2: Stanford University Press, 1978. p. 471-523.
Gårding E and Abramson AS. A study of the perception of some American English intonation contours. Studia Linguistica 1965;19:61-79.
O'Shaughnessy D. Linguistic features in fundamental frequency patterns. J. Phonetics 1979;7:119- 45.
O'Shaughnessy D and Allen J. Linguistic modality effects on fundamental frequency in speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1983;74:1155-71.
Thorsen NG. A study of the perception of sentence intonation — Evidence from Danish. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1980;67:1014-30.
Liu F and Xu Y. Parallel encoding of focus and interrogative meaning in Mandarin intonation. Phonetica 2005;62:70-87.
Fry DB. Experiments in the perception of stress. Lang. Speech 1958;1:126-52.
Prom-on S, Xu Y and Thipakorn B. Modeling tone and intonation in Mandarin and English as a process of target approximation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2009;125:405-24.
Xu Y and Wang QE. Pitch targets and their realization: Evidence from Mandarin Chinese. Speech Commun. 2001;33:319-37.
Boersma P. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 2001;5:9/10:341-5.
Xu Y. ProsodyPro.praat. Available from: . 2005- 2013.
Laniran YO and Clements GN. Downstep and high raising: interacting factors in Yoruba tone production. J. Phonetics 2003;31:203-50.
Xu Y and Liu F. Tonal alignment, syllable structure and coarticulation: Toward an integrated model. Italian Journal of Linguistics 2006;18:125-59.
Xu Y and Liu F. Determining the temporal interval of segments with the help of F0 contours. J. Phonetics 2007;35:398-420.
Gauthier B, Shi R and Xu Y. Learning phonetic categories by tracking movements. Cognition 2007;103:80-106.
Stevens KN. Acoustic Phonetics, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1998.
Kochanski G, Grabe E, Coleman J and Rosner B. Loudness predicts prominence: Fundamental frequency lends little. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2005;118:1038-54.
Chen Y and Xu Y. Production of weak elements in speech -- Evidence from f0 patterns of neutral tone in standard Chinese. Phonetica 2006;63:47-75.
Chao YR. Tone and intonation in Chinese. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 1933;4:121-34.
Chao YR. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1968.
Xu Y. Effects of tone and focus on the formation and alignment of F0 contours. J. Phonetics 1999;27:55-105.
Ho AT. Intonation variation in a Mandarin sentence for three expressions: interrogative, exclamatory and declarative. Phonetica 1977;34:446-57.
Lin M. On production and perception of boundary tone in Chinese intonation In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages: With Emphasis on Tone Languages, Beijing, 2004. 125-9.
Ni J-F and Kawai H. Pitch targets anchor Chinese tone and intonation patterns In: Proceedings of International Conference on Speech Prosody 2004, Nara, Japan, 2004. 95-8.
Rumjancev MK. Ton i intonacija v sovremennom kitajskom jazyke (Tone and Intonation in Modern Chinese), Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta; 1972.
Shen XS. The Prosody of Mandarin Chinese, Berkeley: University of California Press; 1990.
Yuan J. Intonation in Mandarin Chinese: Acoustics, perception, and computational modeling [Unpublished dissertation]. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.; 2004.
Zeng X-L, Martin P and Boulakia G. Tones and intonation in declarative and interrogative sentences in Mandarin In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages: With Emphasis on Tone Languages, Beijing, 2004. 235-8.
Ho AT. Mandarin tones in relation to sentence intonation and grammatical structure. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 1976;4:1-13.
Ho AT. The acoustic variation of Mandarin tones. Phonetica 1976;33:353-67.
Gu W and Lee T. Effects of Tone and Emphatic Focus on Speech Prosody – A Comparison between Standard Chinese and Cantonese In: Proceedings of PCC2008, Beijing, 2008.
Qi S. Hanyu de zidiao, tingdun yu yudiao de jiaohu guanxi [The interaction among lexical tones, pause, and intonation in Chinese]. 中国语文 1956;10:10-3.
Xu Y and Prom-on S. PENTAtrainer1.praat. Available from: . 2010-2012.
Liu F and Xu Y. The neutral tone in question intonation in Mandarin In: Proceedings of Interspeech 2007, Antwerp, 2007. 630-3.
Liu F. Intonation systems of Mandarin and English: A functional approach [PhD dissertation]. The University of Chicago; 2009.
Arvaniti A, Ladd DR and Mennen I. Stability of tonal alignment: the case of Greek prenuclear accents. J. Phonetics 1998;36:3-25.
Barnes J, Veilleux N, Brugos A and Shattuck-Hufnagel S. Turning points, tonal targets, and the English L- phrase accent. Language and Cognitive Processes 2010;25:982-1023.
Ladd DR, Mennen I and Schepman A. Phonological conditioning of peak alignment in rising pitch accents in Dutch. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2000;107:2685-96.
Shue Y-L, Shattuck-Hufnagel S, Iseli M, Jun S-A, Veilleux N and Alwan A. On the acoustic correlates of high and low nuclear pitch accents in American English. Speech Commun. 2010;52:106-22.
Welby P. The role of early fundamental frequency rises and elbows in French word segmentation. Speech Commun. 2007;49:28-48.
Rump HH and Collier R. Focus conditions and the prominence of pitch-accented syllables. Lang. Speech 1996;39:1-17.
Mixdorff H. Quantitative tone and intonation modeling across languages In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages: With Emphasis on Tone Languages, Beijing, 2004. 137-42.
Xu Y, Xu CX and Sun X. On the Temporal Domain of Focus In: Proceedings of International Conference on Speech Prosody 2004, Nara, Japan, 2004. 81-4.
Chen Y and Gussenhoven C. Emphasis and tonal implementation in Standard Chinese. J. Phonetics 2008;36:724-46.
Pierrehumbert J. The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation [Ph.D. dissertation]. MIT, Cambridge, MA. [Published in 1987 by Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington]; 1980.
Liberman M and Pierrehumbert J. Intonational invariance under changes in pitch range and length. In: M Aronoff and R Oehrle, editors. Language Sound Structure, Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press, 1984. p. 157-233.
Grice M, Ladd DR and Arvaniti A. On the place of phrase accents in intonational phonology. Phonology 2000;17:143-85.
Pierrehumbert J and Beckman M. Japanese Tone Structure, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1988.
Wu WL and Xu Y. Prosodic Focus in Hong Kong Cantonese without Post-focus Compression In: Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2010, Chicago, 2010.
Wang B, Wang L and Kadir T. Prosodic encoding of focus in six languages in China In: Proceedings of The 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Hong Kong, 2011. 144-7.
Kügler F and Skopeteas S. On the universality of prosodic reflexes of contrast: The case of Yucatec Maya In: Proceedings of The 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrücken, Germany, 2007.
Rialland A and Robert S. The intonational system of Wolof. Linguistics 2001;39:893–939.
Zerbian S, Genzel S and Kügler F. Experimental work on prosodically-marked information structure in selected African languages (Afroasiatic and Niger-Congo) In: Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2010, Chicago, 2010. 100976:1-4.
Xu Y. Post-focus compression: Cross-linguistic distribution and historical origin In: Proceedings of The 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Hong Kong, 2011. 152-5.
Rialland A. African "lax" question prosody: its realisations and its geographical distribution. Lingua 2009;119:928-49. 75. Suomi K. On the tonal and temporal domains of accent in Finnish. J. Phonetics 2007;35:40-55.
Wagner M. Prosody and Recursion [Ph.D. Dissertation]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 2005. 77. Xu Y and Wang M. Organizing syllables into groups—Evidence from F0 and duration patterns in Mandarin. J. Phonetics 2009;37:502-20.
Wang B and Xu Y. Differential prosodic encoding of topic and focus at sentence initial position in Mandarin Chinese. J. Phonetics 2011;39:595-611.
Swerts M and Ostendorf M. Prosodic and lexical indications of discourse structure in humanmachine interactions. Speech Commun. 1997;22:25-41.
Xu Y, Kelly A and Smillie C. Emotional expressions as communicative signals. In: S Hancil and D Hirst, editors. Prosody and Iconicity: Benjamins, 2013. pp. 33-60.
Blevins J. Duality of patterning: Absolute universal or statistical tendency? langcog 2012;4:275-96.
Byrd D, Krivokapić J and Lee S. How far, how long: On the temporal scope of phrase boundary effects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2006;120:1589-99.
Lisker L. "Voicing" in English: A catalogue of acoustic features signaling /b/ versus /p/ in trochees. Lang. Speech 1986;29:3-11.
Liu F and Xu Y. Question intonation as affected by word stress and focus in English In: Proceedings of The 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrücken, 2007. 1189-92.
Prom-on S, Liu F and Xu Y. Functional modeling of tone, focus and sentence type in mandarin Chinese In: Proceedings of The 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Hong Kong, 2011. 1638-41.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2013 Fang Liu, Yi Xu, Santitham Prom-on, Alan C. L. Yu
