Banner Portal
Digital preservation metadata and archival digital records
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Metadata
Digital Preservation
Archival digital records

How to Cite

SILVA, Pedro Felipy Cunha da; ARAÚJO, Wagner Junqueira de; SIEBRA, Sandra de Albuquerque. Digital preservation metadata and archival digital records. Brazilian Journal of Digital Preservation, Campinas, SP, v. 2, n. 00, p. e021003, 2021. DOI: 10.20396/rebpred.v2i00.15890. Disponível em: https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/rebpred/article/view/15890. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2024.

Abstract

This article reflects on the concept of digital records, the conditions that make a archival digital record. It is argued that the global coronavirus pandemic has forced the provision of digital services to several services, emphasizing the digital transformation of public and private services, such as remote work and teaching. In this way, it is understood that the use of electronic platforms has caused a significant increase in digital records, which document the most varied types of personal and professional activities, and evidenced the needs of metadata for preservation activities. The discussions were developed based on a systematic literature review, which identified the theoretical contributions to support a study on the relationships between archival digital records and metadata for digital preservation. It was found that, from the moment the metadata becomes part of the archival digital record, care for the management of these metadata becomes as important as care for the management of the document or record, in isolation. Since it is impossible to carry out the long-term preservation of these materials without the effective management of the metadata that compose it. It is urgent, on the part of Archivists, to expand the understanding of archival digital records as a theoretical construct with different conceptual and pragmatic challenges - but not excluding, those existing in the digital archival document.

https://doi.org/10.20396/rebpred.v2i00.15890
PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

ACKER, A. Quando é um registro? Estrutura de pesquisa para localização de registros eletrônicos na infraestrutura. GILLILAND, A. J.; MCKEMISH, S.; LAU, A. J. (org.). Pesquisa no multiverso arquivístico. Tradução de Ana C. Rodrigues. Salvador: 9Bravos, 2019.

ADU, K. K.; NGULUBE, P. Preserving the digital heritage of public institutions in Ghana in the wake of electronic government. LIBRARY HI TECH, ENGLAND, v. 34, n. 4, p. 748–763, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-07-2016-0077. Acesso em: 07 ago. 2021.

ARAÚJO, C. A. A. O que é ciência da informação. Belo Horizonte: KMA, 2018.

ARQUIVO NACIONAL (Brasil). Dicionário Brasileiro de Terminologia Arquivística. Rio de Janeiro: Arquivo Nacional, 2005.

BARON, J. R.; THURSTON, A. What lessons can be learned from the US archivist’s digital mandate for 2019 and is there potential for applying them in lower resource countries? Records Management Journal, [s.l.], v. 26, no 2, p. 206–217, 2016.

BRINDLEY, G.; MUIR, A.; PROBETS, S. Provision of digital preservation metadata: A role for ONIX? Program, [S. l.], v. 38, n. 4, p. 240–250, 2004. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1108/00330330410699883. Acesso em: 07 ago. 2021.

CÂMARA TÉCNICA DE DOCUMENTOS ELETRÔNICOS (CTDE). Glossário. Disponível em: http://www.documentoseletronicos.arquivonacional.gov.br/media/2008ctdeglossariov5.pdf. Acesso em: 12 ago. 2021.

CANTARA, L. Long-term preservation of digital humanities scholarship. OCLC Systems and Services, [S. l.], v. 22, n. 1, p. 38–42, 2006. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1108/10650750610640793. Acesso em: 07 ago. 2021.

CASTELLS, M. A sociedade em rede: a era da informação: economia, sociedade e cultura. Tradução Roneide Venâncio Majer. 6. ed. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 2002.

CCSDS – Consultative Committee for Space Data System. Reference Model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS). Blue book (CCSDS 650.0-B-1). Washington, DC: CCSDS, 2002. Disponível em http://public.ccsds.org/publications/archive/650x0b1.pdf. Acesso em: 06 ago. 2021.

CONSELHO NACIONAL DE ARQUIVOS (BRASIL). Câmara Técnica de Documentos Eletrônicos. e-ARQ Brasil: Modelo de Requisitos para Sistemas Informatizados de Gestão Arquivística de Documentos. Rio de Janeiro: Arquivo Nacional, 2011. Disponível em: http://www.siga.arquivonacional.gov.br/images/publicacoes/e-arq.pdf. Acesso em: 26 jul. 2021.

CONSELHO NACIONAL DE ARQUIVOS (BRASIL). Câmara Técnica de Documentos Eletrônicos. Resolução nº. 43, de 4 de setembro de 2015. Estabelece diretrizes para a implementação de repositórios arquivísticos digitais confiáveis para o arquivamento e manutenção de documentos arquivísticos digitais em suas fases corrente, intermediária e permanente, dos órgãos e entidades integrantes do Sistema Nacional de Arquivos - SINAR. Disponível em: http://conarq.gov.br/resolucoes-do-conarq/281-resolucao-n-39-de-29-de-abril-de-2014.html. Acesso em: 26 jul. 2021.

CONSELHO NACIONAL DE ARQUIVOS (BRASIL). Câmara Técnica de Documentos Eletrônicos (CTDE). Glossário documentos arquivísticos digitais. 2020. Disponível em: http://antigo.conarq.gov.br/images/ctde/Glossario/glosctde_2020_08_07.pdf. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2021.

DAPPERT, A. et al. Describing and preserving digital object environments. New Review of Information Networking, [s. l.], v. 18, n. 2, p. 106–173, 2013. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/13614576.2013.842494. Acesso em: 07 ago. 2021.

DAY, M. Preservation metadata. UKOLN, University of Bath, 2003. Disponível em: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/publications/iylim-2003/. Acesso em: 07 ago. 2021.

DIGITAL PRESERVATION WORKING GROUP, UNIVERSITY LIBRARY, GLASGOW UNIVERSITY. Glasgow University Digital Preservation Policy - Version 3.8. Glasgow: [s. n.], 2020. Disponível em: https://www.gla.ac.uk/media/Media_598622_smxx.pdf. Acesso em: 07 ago. 2021.

FENG, H. Identity and archives: return and expansion of the social value of archives. Archival Science, v. 17, no 2, p. 97–112, 2017.

FORMENTON, D. et al. Metadata standards as a technological resource to guarantee digital preservation. Biblios – Revista de bibliotecologia y Ciencias de la Informacion, USA, n. 68, p. 82–95, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5195/biblios.2017.414. Acesso em: 07 ago. 2021.

HENTTONEN, P. Privacy as an archival problem and a solution. Archival Science, v. 17, no 3, p. 285–303, 2017. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10502-017-9277-0. Acesso em: 07 ago. 2021.

KATUU, S. Managing digital records in a global environment. The Electronic Library, [s.l.], v. 34, no 5, p. 869–894, 2016, DOI: 10.1108/EL-04-2015-0064. Acesso em: 07 ago. 2021.

LAVOIE, B.; GARTNER, R. Preservation Metadata. OCLC, September 2005. Disponível em: http://www.dpconline.org/docs/reports/dpctw05-01.pdf. Acesso em: 05 ago. 2021.

LE COADIC, Y. F. A Ciência da Informação. Tradução Maria Yeda S. F. de Filgueiras Gomes. Brasília: Briquet de Lemos, 1996.

LEVY, P. Cibercultura. São Paulo: Editora 34, 1999. Disponível em: https://mundonativodigital.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/cibercultura-pierre-levy.pdf. Acesso em: 12 ago. 2021.

LI, C.; SUGIMOTO, S. Provenance description of metadata using PROV with PREMIS for long-term use of metadata. Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications. Dublin Core metadata initiative, 2014. p. 147–156. Disponível em: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85013660318&partnerID=40&md5=ca8571fafb61e76760ff385b7df0097f. Acesso em: 07 ago. 2021.

MATTERLART, A. História da sociedade da informação. Ed. Loyola: São Paulo, 2006.

MOHER, D. et al. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLOS Medicine, v. 6, n. 4, p. 1-6, 2009. Disponível em: http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097&type=printable. Acesso em: 18 jul. 2021.

RAMALHO, J. C. et al. RODA-in A generic tool for the mass creation of Submission Information Packages. In: 12th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI). Nova Iorque, Estados Unidos, 2017. Disponível em: https://dx.doi.org/10.23919/CISTI.2017.7975761. Acesso em: 07 set. 2020.

RIES, T. The rationale of the born-digital dossier genetique: Digital forensics and the writing process: With examples from the Thomas Kling Archive. DIGITAL SCHOLARSHIP IN THE HUMANITIES, ENGLAND, v. 33, n. 2, p. 391–424, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqx049. Acesso em: 07 ago. 2021.

ROGERS, C. Diplomatics of born digital documents - considering documentary form in a digital environment. Records Management Journal, [s.l.], v. 25, no 1, p. 6–20, 2015. ISSN: 09565698, DOI: 10.1108/RMJ-03-2014-0021. Acesso em: 07 ago. 2021.

SAYÃO, L. F. Uma outra face dos metadados: informações para a gestão da preservação digital. Encontros Bibli: Revista Eletrônica de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, [S. l.], p. 1–31, 2010. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2010v15n30p1. Acesso em: 07 ago. 2021.

SCHWAITZER, L. de B. da S. O arquivista na aurora digital: diálogo com Bruno Delmas. Revista do Arquivo, n. 6, p. 9-15, Abr. 2018. ISSN: 2447-908X. Disponível em: http://www.arquivoestado.sp.gov.br/revista_do_arquivo/06/ensaio.php#inicio_artigo. Acesso em: 10 ago. 2021.

SPENCE, A. et al. Case study: the University of Glasgow’s digital preservation journey 2017-2019. Insights, Research Information Administrator: digital preservation University, v. 32, p. 1–9, 2019. Disponível em: https://search.proquest.com/docview/2203049840?accountid=149610. Acesso em: 07 ago. 2021.

SVÄRD, P. The woes of Swedish private archival institutions. Records Management Journal, [s.l.], v. 27, no 3, p. 275–285, 2017. ISSN: 09565698, DOI: 10.1108/RMJ-01-2016-0003. Acesso em: 13 ago. 2021.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Pedro Felipy Cunha da Silva, Wagner Junqueira de Araújo, Sandra de Albuerque Siebra

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.