Abstract
This article analyzes the critical production of two renowned names in Latin America’s 20th century scenario: Antonio Bento and Romero Brest. These authors were contemporaneous and left important contributions to the art critique in their respective countries, Brazil and Argentina, for the consolidation of abstractionism. Through a comparative approach to both critics, we highlight the similarities and differences in their discourses. The city of São Paulo was marked by important cultural changes: the foundation of MASP and the I Art Biennial of São Paulo.
Ultimately, we sought to evince the contributions of an art critique specialized in building and promoting abstract art as artistic language also pertinent to Brazil and Argentina.
References
ARANTES, Otília. (Org.). Modernidade Cá e Lá: textos escolhidos IV. São Paulo: EDUSP, 2000.
BENTO, ANTONIO. Notas diversas. Diário Carioca, Rio de Janeiro, 19 abr.1950. AS ARTES, p.6.
BENTO, ANTONIO. Notas diversas. Diário Carioca, Rio de Janeiro, 16 maio. 1950. AS ARTES, p.6.
BENTO, ANTONIO. Notas e Comentários. Diário Carioca, Rio de Janeiro, 25 set. 1951. AS ARTES, p.06
BENTO, ANTONIO. No Atelier de Iberê Camargo. Diário Carioca, Rio de Janeiro, 26 out. 1951. AS ARTES, p.06.
ROMERO BREST, Jorge. El arte en la Argentina. Buenos Aires: Paidós, 1969.
VER Y ESTIMAR. Buenos Aires: Editorial Losada, n.26, noviembre de 1951.
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Araceli Barros J. Bedtcher