Banner Portal
The role of allusions to the hesiodic "didactic poetry" in Theocrit Idílio 10
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Theocritus’ Idyll 10
Hesiod
Lityerses
Bucolic poetry
Didactic poetry

How to Cite

MOURA, Alessandro Rolim de. The role of allusions to the hesiodic "didactic poetry" in Theocrit Idílio 10. PhaoS - Revista de Estudos Clássicos, Campinas, SP, v. 22, n. 00, p. e022013, 2022. DOI: 10.20396/phaos.v22i00.17273. Disponível em: https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/phaos/article/view/17273. Acesso em: 19 jul. 2024.

Abstract

This article argues that the allusions to Hesiod in Theocritus’ Idyll 10 do not necessarily make the poem a non-bucolic text. The presence of Hesiod is visible not only in Milon’s speech and song, but also in Bucaeus’, and gives us various clues as to how Theocritus perceived Hesiod. Theocritus’ Hesiod, in Id. 10 and elsewhere in the Idylls, is not merely a vehicle of serious “didactic poetry”. Milon’s merciless attitude, obsession with work and food, and utilitarian view of poetry cannot simply be called “Hesiodic”; they rather represent the impact of Lityerses (another legendary singer) upon Milon. Theocritus’ Hesiod is also an artist who sings of beauty and pleasure, both in nature and in poetry itself. Theocritus’ reception of Hesiod is of capital importance for the genesis of bucolic poetry.

https://doi.org/10.20396/phaos.v22i00.17273
PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

ARGENTIERI, L. I piedi di Bombica (Theocr. Id. 10.36). In: NICOLAI, R. (Org.). Ῥυσμός: studi di poesia, metrica e musica greca offerti dagli allievi a Luigi Enrico Rossi. Roma: Quasar, 2003, p. 347-355.

BEEKES, R. Etymological dictionary of Greek. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2010.

BLAISE, F.; ROUSSEAU, P. La guerre (Théogonie, v. 617-720). In: BLAISE, F.; LA COMBE, P. J. de; ROUSSEAU, P. (Orgs.). Le métier du mythe. Lectures d’Hésiode. Lille: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion, 1996, p. 213-33.

CAIRNS, F. Theocritus Idyll 10. Hermes, n. 98.1, p. 38-44, 1970.

DENNISTON, J. D. The Greek particles. 2. ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1954.

DI BENEDETTO, V. Omerismi e struttura metrica negli idilli dorici di Teocrito. Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. Lettere, Storia e Filosofia, Serie II, n. 25.1/2, p. 48-60, 1956.

DOVER, K. J. Theocritus, Select poems. Edited with an introduction and commentary. London: Macmillan, 1971.

DURÁN MAÑAS, M. Las mujeres en los Idilios de Teócrito. Zaragoza: Prensas de la Universidad de Zaragoza, 2014.

EDWARDS, G. P. The language of Hesiod in its traditional context. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1971.

FALIVENE, M. R. What is in an idyll? Contrasting modes in Theocritus, Idyll 10. In: COJANNOT-LE BLANC, M.; POUZADOUX, C.; PRIOUX, E. (Orgs.). L’héroïque et le champêtre. Vol. II: appropriation et déconstruction des théories stylistiques dans la pratique des artistes et dans les modalités d’exposition des oeuvres. Nanterre: Presses Universitaires de Paris Ouest, 2014, p. 33-40.

FANTUZZI, M. Variazioni sull’esametro in Teocrito. In: FANTUZZI, M.; PRETAGOSTINI, R. (Orgs.). Struttura e storia dell’esametro greco. Vol. I. Roma: Gruppo Editoriale Internazionale, 1995, p. 221-264.

FRAZER, J. G. The golden bough: a study in magic and religion. Part V: Spirits of the corn and of the wild. Vol. I. 3. ed. London: Macmillan and Co., 1912.

FRITZSCHE, A. T. A. Theocriti Idyllia. 2. ed. parabilior uno uolumine comprehensa. Leipzig: Teubner [1. ed. em 2 vols. 1868-1869], 1870.

GALLAVOTTI, C. Theocritus quique feruntur bucolici Graeci. 2. ed. Roma: Typis Publicae Officinae Polygraphicae [1. ed. 1946], 1955.

GOW, A. S. F. Theocritus. 2. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1952.

GOW, A. S. F. Bucolici Graeci. Corr. repr. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1958.

GRETHLEIN, J. A slim girl and the fat of the land in Theocritus, Id. 10. The Classical Quarterly, New Series, n. 62.2, p. 603-617, 2012.

HALPERIN, D. M. Before pastoral: Theocritus and the ancient tradition of bucolic poetry. New Haven; London: Yale University Press, 1983.

HOFINGER, M. Lexicon Hesiodeum cum indice inuerso. Tome II, E-K. Leiden: Brill, 1976.

HOPKINSON, N. A Hellenistic anthology. 2. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.

HUNT, J. M. Bucolic experimentation in Theocritus’ Idyll 10. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, n. 49, p. 391-412, 2009.

HUNTER, R. Theocritus and the archaeology of Greek poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

HUNTER, R. Theocritus: a selection (Idylls 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10, 11 and 13). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

HUNTER, R. Hesiodic voices: studies in the ancient reception of Hesiod’s Works and days. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.

HUTCHINSON, G. O. Hellenistic poetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.

KONING, H. H. Hesiod: the other poet. Ancient reception of a cultural icon. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2010.

KYRIAKOU, P. Theocritus and his native Muse: a Syracusan among many. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter, 2018.

LEGRAND, P.-E. Étude sur Théocrite. Paris: Albert Fontemoing, 1898.

LEGRAND, P.-E. Bucoliques grecs. Tome I: Théocrite. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1925.

LELLI, E. Lettura folklorica di Theocr. Id. 10, 38-58. In: BETTARINI, L. (Org.). A più mani: linee di ricerca tracciate in “Sapienza”. Pisa; Roma: Serra, p. 78-88, 2015.

LELLI, E. Pastori antichi e moderni: Teocrito e le origini popolari della poesia bucolica. Hildesheim; Zürich; New York: Georg Olms, 2017.

LEMBACH, K. Die Pflanzen bei Theokrit. Heidelberg: Carl Winter-Universitätsverlag, 1970.

LENTINI, G. Amore ‘fuori luogo’: presenze saffiche ed esiodee nell’idillio 10 di Teocrito. Studi Classici e Orientali, n. 46.3, p. 903-907, 1998.

LEUTSCH, E. L. a; SCHNEIDEWIN, F. G. Corpus paroemiographorum Graecorum. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1839-1851.

NELSON, S. Hesiod, Virgil, and the georgic tradition. In: LONEY, A. C.; SCULLY, S. (Orgs.). The Oxford handbook of Hesiod. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018, p. 363-376.

NOGUEIRA, E. Verdade, contenda e poesia nos Idílios de Teócrito. Tese de Doutorado (Universidade de São Paulo). São Paulo, 2012.

OTT, U. Die Kunst des Gegensatzes in Theokrits Hirtengedichten. Hildesheim; New York: G. Olms, 1969.

PETROPOULOS, J. C. B. The Church Father as social informant: St. John Crysostom on folk-songs. In: LIVINGSTONE, E. A. (org.). Studia Patristica. Vol. XXII. Papers presented to the Tenth International Conference on Patristic Studies. Leuven: Peeters, 1989, p. 159-164, .

PETROPOULOS, J. C. B. Heat and lust: Hesiod’s midsummer festival scene revisited. Lanham; London: Rowman & Littlefield, 1994.

PÖHLMANN, E. Charakteristika des römischen Lehrgedichts. In: TEMPORINI, H. (Org.). Aufstieg und Niedergand der römischen Welt. Vol. I.3. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter, 1973, p. 813-901.

PUCCI, P. Inno alle Muse (Esiodo, Teogonia, 1-115). Pisa; Roma: Fabrizio Serra, 2007.

RACE, W. H. The classical priamel from Homer to Boethius. Leiden: Brill, 1982.

REINHARDT, T. Die Darstellung der Bereiche Stadt und Land bei Theokrit. Bonn: Habelt, 1988.

RICHER, H. Boucaios est-il un nom propre ou un nom commun ? (Théocrite, Nicandre, Posidippe). Aitia, n. 9.1, 2019, http://journals.openedition.org/aitia/3582, acesso em 9 de setembro de 2022.

ROLIM DE MOURA, A. Hesíodo, Os trabalhos e os dias. Curitiba: Segesta, 2012.

ROLIM DE MOURA, A. Hesiodic patterns in Lucan: cosmic and civil wars. The Classical Journal, n. 116, p. 47-79, 2020.

ROLIM DE MOURA, A. Poesia bucólica: Virgílio, Calpúrnio Sículo, Nemesiano. Campinas; Curitiba: Editora da Unicamp; Editora da UFPR, no prelo.

ROSENMEYER, T. G. The green cabinet: Theocritus and the European pastoral lyric. Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1969.

SCHMIDT, E. A. Poetische Reflexion: Vergils Bukolik. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 1972.

SCHOLL, W. Der Daphnis-Mythos und seine Entwicklung: von den Anfängen bis zu Vergils vierter Ekloge. Hildesheim; Zürich; New York: Georg Olms, 2014.

SERRAO, G. Problemi de poesia alessandrina I: incoerenze e imitazioni omeriche in Teocrito (X. 12 e II. 4,157). Helikon, n. 3, p. 437-447, 1963.

SIDER, D. Didactic poetry: the Hellenistic invention of a pre-existing genre. In: HUNTER, R.; RENGAKOS, A.; SISTAKOU, E. (Orgs.). Hellenistic studies at a crossroads: exploring texts, contexts and metatexts. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter, 2014, p. 13-29.

SNELL, B. Tragicorum Graecorum Fragmenta (TrGF). Vol. 1. Ed. corr. e aum. R. Kannicht. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1986.

SOLMSEN, F.; MERKELBACH, R.; WEST, M. L. Hesiodi Theogonia, Opera et dies, Scutum, fragmenta selecta. 3. ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.

STRANO, M. Considerazioni sull’idillio X di Teocrito. Helikon, n. 15-16, p. 454-460, 1975-1976.

THALMANN, W. G. Theocritean spaces. In: KYRIAKOU, P; SISTAKOU, E.; RENGAKOS, A. (Orgs.). Brill’s companion to Theocritus. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2021, p. 454-472.

THILO, G. Servii Grammatici qui feruntur in Vergilii Bucolica et Georgica commentarii. Leipzig: Teubner, 1887.

TORRANO, J. Hesíodo, Teogonia: a origem dos Deuses. 2. ed. São Paulo: Iluminuras, 1992.

VAN SICKLE, J. Epic and bucolic (Theocritus, Id. VII; Virgil, Ecl. I). Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica, n. 19, p. 45-72, 1975.

VAN SICKLE, J. Theocritus and the development of the conception of bucolic genre. Ramus, n. 5.1, p. 18-44, 1976.

WENDEL, C. Scholia in Theocritum uetera. Leipzig: Teubner, 1914.

WERNER, C. Teogonia, Hesíodo. 2. ed. São Paulo: Hedra, 2022.

WEST, M. L. Hesiod, Theogony. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1966.

WEST, M. L. Hesiod, Works & days. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978.

WHITEHORNE, J. E. G. The reapers: Theocritus ‘Idyll’ 10. Journal of the Australasian Universities Modern Language Association, n. 41, p. 30-49, 1974.

WILAMOWITZ-MOELLENDORFF, U. von. Bucolici Graeci. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1905.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Phaos: Revista de Estudos Clássicos

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.