Keywords
Corporate social responsibility
Mining
Social license
How to Cite
Abstract
The mining industry seeks to promote more responsible environmental and social practices with stakeholders in order to better distribute the benefits of the operation and avoid negative social and environmental externalities from previous experiences. The case study of the new social responsibility model of Alcoa in Juruti (Pará) highlights that despite the conflicts with rural communities, the benefits from the mining operation were actually distributed, even if asymmetrically, among the population of the urban and rural areas of Juruti.References
ALCOA, FGV (GV-Ces), FunBio; World Resources Institute. Juruti Sustentável – uma proposta de modelo para o desenvolvimento local., LOCAL EM QUE FOI PUBLICADA, FGV, 2009.
ABDALA, Fabio. Juruti Sustentável: Uma Proposta de Modelo para Mineração e Desenvolvimento Local. Trabalho Técnico apresentado no Congresso Brasileiro de Mineração, 6, agosto de 2010, Belo Horizonte.
ABDALA, Fabio. Mineração e Sustentabilidade: O Caso da Mina de Bauxita de Juruti. Trabalho apresentado no evento Iniciativas Inovadoras em Monitoramento do desenvolvimento Local e Avaliação de Inpacto (IDLocal), Fundação Getúlio Vargas, 04 de agosto de 2015, São Paulo-SP.
BARTOLINI, Jéssica et al. Alcoa Brazil´s New Sustainability Model for Mining – An Independent Review. Relatório de pesquisa. School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA), Columbia University, Centro de Estudos das Negociações Internacionais (CAENI), Instituto de Relações Internacionais da Universidade de São Paulo (IRI-USP), 2010. Disponível em: http://www.sipa.columbia.edu/academics/concentrations/epd/documents/Alcoa_FinalReport_10May2010.pdf. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2015.
BÖRZEL, Tanja e HÖNKE, Jana. Mining Companies and the Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Paper apresentado na Convenção anual da American Political Science Association [Associação Nacional de Ciência Política], Washington, DC, em setembro de 2010. Disponível em: http://www.sfb-governance.de/en/publikationen/working_papers/wp25/SFB-GovernanceWorking-Paper-25.pdf. Acesso em: 22 jun. 2016.
CAMPBELL, John L. Why Would Corporations Behave in Socially Responsible Ways? – An Institutional Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review, Nova Iorque, 32 (3), p. 946-967, 2007.
DAGNINO, Evelina (Org.) Sociedade civil e espaços públicos no Brasil. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 2002.
FREY, Klaus. A Dimensão Político-democrática das Teorias de Desenvolvimento Sustentável e suas Implicações para a Gestão Local. Ambiente & Sociedade, ano IV, número 9, p. 115-148, 2001.
FRIEDMAN, Milton. Capitalism and Freedom. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1962.
FRIEDMAN, Milton. The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits. The New York Times, 13 de setembro de 1970, p. 32-33.
FULMER, Amand M.; GODOY, Angelina S.; NEFF, Philip. Indigenous Rights, Resistence and the Law: Lessons from Guatemala Mine. Latin American Politics and Society, Miami, University of Miami, 50 (4), p. 91-121, 2008.
FUNDAÇÃO Getúlio Vargas. Indicadores de Juruti. São Paulo, FGV, 2009.
GHOUL, Sadak El et al. Does Corporate Social Responsability Affect the Cost of Capital? Disponível em: http://ssm.com/abstract. Acesso em: 12 dez. 2010.
GARRIGA, Elisabet; MELÉ, Domenèc. Corporate Social Responsabilities Theories: Mapping the Territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, p. 51-71, 2004. Disponível em: http://www.springer.com/social+sciences/applied+ethics/journal/10551.
GIFFORD, Blair; KESTLER, Andrew; ANAND, Shamila. Building Local Legitimacy into Corporate Social Responsibility: Gold Mining Firms in Developing Nations. Journal of World Business, 45, p. 304-311, 2010.
GURZA LAVALLE, A.; HOUTZAGER, P. P.; CASTELLO, G. Representação política e organizações civis: novas instâncias de mediação e os desafios da legitimidade. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, São Paulo, v. 21, n. 60, p. 43-66, 2006.
NAÇÕES UNIDAS. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future, 1987. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 12 jul. 2012.
NEWELL, Peter. Citizenship, Accountability and Community: The Limits of CSR Agenda. International Affairs, 81 (3), p. 541-557, 2005.
OSTROM, Elinor. Governing the Commons – The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1990.
PALOVIITA, Ari; LUOMA-AHO, Vilma. Recognizing Definitive Stakeholders in Corporate Environmental Management. Management Research Review, Bingley, West Yorkshire, v. 33, n. 4, p. 306-316, 2010.
PETER, B. Guy. Gobernanza Y Burocracia Pública: ¿Nuevas Formas de Democracia o Nuevas Formas de Control?, Foro Internacional, 182, XLV, (4), p. 585-598, 2005.
REES, Caroline. Report of the International Roundtable on Conflict Management and Corporate Culture in the Mining Industry. Harvard Kennedy School, Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Report n. 37, 2009.
RIO TINTO Qit Madagascar Minerals S/A. Sustainable Development Report, 2009. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 11 jan. 2011.
RODIN, David. The Ownership Model of Business Ethics. In: BARRY, Christian; POGGE, Thomas W. Global Institutions and Responsibilities – Achieving Global Justice. Reino Unido, Blackwell Publishing, 2005, p. 235-252.
SADLER, David. Trade Unions, Coalitions and Communities: Australia’s Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union and the international stakeholder campaign against Rio Tinto. Geoforum, n. 35, p. 35-46, 2004.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2016 RURIS - Revista do Centro de Estudos Rurais - UNICAMP
