Keywords
Rurality and environmental regulation
Territorial governance
How to Cite
Abstract
The debate about new possibilities of development for rural areas was expanded in several countries during the 1990s. Overall, this discussion has pointed to the need for the implementation of development strategies to support pacts between different actors involved in the local sociopolitical network. This article presents a sociological interpretation of modern instances of political governance in rural areas – more specifically, the regional and municipal councils for rural development. Therefore, it will be presented a study case conducted in the municipality of Paranapanema, located in the southwestern of São Paulo state. The main issue to be investigated will be the presence of forms of symbolic and material domination of social space inside decentralized instances of socioterritorial governance.References
ABRAMOVAY, R. O futuro das regiões rurais. Porto Alegre: Editora UFRGS, 2003.
BOONSTRA, W. J. Policies in the polder: how institutions mediate between norms and practices of rural governance. Sociologia Ruralis, v. 46, n. 4, p. 299-317, 2006.
BOURDIEU, P. A economia das trocas lingüísticas: o que falar quer dizer. São Paulo: Edusp, 1996.
BOURDIEU, P. Les structures sociales de l’économie. Paris: Seuil, 2000.
BROWLEY, Daniel W. (Ed.). The handbook of environmental economics. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers, 1996.
BURGESS, J.; CLARK, J.; HARRISON, C. Knowledges in action: an actor network analysis of a wetland agri-environment scheme. Ecological Economics, v. 35, n. 1, p. 119-132, 2000.
BURTON, R. J.; KUCZERA, C.; SCHWARZ, G. Exploring farmer’s cultural resistance to voluntary agri-environmental schemes. Sociologia Ruralis, v. 48, n. 1, p. 18-36, 2008.
BURTON, R. J. Seeing through the “good farmer’s” eyes: towards developing an understanding of the social symbolic value of “productivist” behaviour. Sociologia Ruralis, v. 44, n.2, p. 195-216, 2004.
CAMPANHOLA, C.; SILVA, J. G. Diretrizes de políticas públicas para o novo rural brasileiro: incorporando a noção de desenvolvimento local. In: CAMPANHOLA, Clayton; SILVA, José G. (Eds.). O novo rural brasileiro: políticas públicas. Jaguariúna: Embrapa, 2000, v. 4, p. 61-92.
CARRIER, M.; CÔTÉ, S. (Eds.). Gouvernance et territoires ruraux: éléments d’un débats sur la responsabilité du développement. Québec: PUQ, 2000, coleção Sciences Régionales.
CONNELLY, S; RICHARDSON, T; MILES, T. Situated legitimacy: deliberative arenas and neu rural governance. Journal of Rural Studies, n. 22, p. 267-277, 2006.
COUDELL, E.; TONNEAU, J. P. Como avaliar a contribuição de uma formação no desenvolvimento territorial?. Reflexões a partir da experiência da universidade camponesa no território do Cariri paraibano. Working Paper. Inra/Cirad, 2007.
DIXON, J. A.; SHERMAN, P. B. Economics of proteged areas: a new look at benefits and costs. London: Earthscan Publications, 1990.
DOUGLAS, D. J. A. The restructuring of local government in rural regions: a rural development perspective. Journal of Rural Studies, n. 21, p. 231-246, 2005.
ELIAS, N. Qu’est-ce que la sociologie?. Paris: L’Aube, 1991.
FAURE, A. Territoires et subsidiarité: l’action publique locale à la lumière d’un principe controversé. Paris: L’Harmattan, 1997, coleção Logiques Politiques.
FISCHER, F. Reframing public policy: discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
GOODWIN, M. The governance of rural areas: some emerging research issues and agends. Journal of Rural Studies, v. 14, n. 1, p. 5-12, 1998.
HAJER, M. Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences, n.36, p.175–195, 2003.
HERVIEU, B. Les champs du futur. Paris: Bourdin Francois Eds., 1993.
HOWARD, J. Using game theory to explain the behaviour of participants involved in a regional governance process. Rural Society, v. 16, n. 3, p. 254-270, 2006.
JANVRY, A.; SADOULET, E. Fitting the facts and capitalizing on new opportunities to redesign rural development programs in Latin America. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, v. 42(3), p. 399-430, 2004.
JEAN, B. Territoires d’avenir: pour une sociologie de la ruralité. Quebéc: PUQ, 1997.
JOLLIVET, M. Pour une science sociale à travers champs: paysannerie, ruralité capitalisme (France XXe sciècle). Paris: Arguments, 2001.
KAYSER, B. La renaissance rurale: sociologie des campagnes du monde occidental. Paris: A. Colin, 1990.
MARSDEN, T. The condition of rural sustainability. Assen: Van Gorcum, 2003.
MARTINS, J. S. A sujeição da renda da terra ao capital e o novo sentido da luta pela reforma agrária. In: Os camponeses e a política no Brasil: as lutas sociais no campo e seu lugar no processo político, 5a ed. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1995, p. 151-177.
MARTINS, J. S. A sociabilidade do homem simples: cotidiano e história na modernidade anômala. São Paulo: Hucitec, 2000.
MARTINS, R. C. Ruralidade e regulação ambiental: notas para um debate político-institucional. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, v. 43, p. 249-266, 2005.
MARTINS, R. C. Poder e legitimidade nos enunciados ambientais contemporâneos. Oficina do CES, Coimbra, Universidade de Coimbra, n. 312, ago. 2008.
MILLS, C. W. A imaginação sociológica, 5a ed. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 1980.
MORRIS, C. Negotiating the boundary between state-led and farmer approaches to knowing nature: an analysis of UK agrienvironment schemes. Geoforum, v. 37, n. 1, p. 113-127, 2006.
MURDOCH, J; MARSDEN, T. Reconstituting rurality: class, community and power in the development process. London: UCL Press, 1994.
PATTON, M. Q. Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3a ed. London: Sage Publications, 2002.
PEARCE, D. W.; TURNER, R. K. Economics of natural resources and the environment. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991.
PEARCE, D. W. Economic values and the natural world. Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1993.
SAA–SP – SECRETARIA DE AGRICULTURA E ABASTACIMENTO DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO. Programa estadual de microbacias hidrográficas: avaliação de meio termo. Belo Horizonte: Del Giudice Assessoria Técnica Ltda./The World Bank/ SAA–SP, 2004.
SCHNEIDER, S. A abordagem territorial do desenvolvimento rural e suas articulações externas. Sociologias, v. 11, p. 88-125, 2004.
SHORTALL, S. Social or economic goals, civic inclusion or exclusion? An analysis of rural development theory and practice. Sociologia Ruralis, n. 44, p. 109-123, 2004.
VEIGA, J. E. O Brasil rural precisa de uma estratégia de desenvolvimento. Brasília: Nead, 2001, Série Textos para Discussão, n. 1.
WEBER, M. A ética protestante e o espírito do capitalismo, 15a ed. São Paulo: Pioneira, 2000.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2012 RURIS (Campinas, Online)
