Palavras-chave
Ocde
Governança global
Sociologia organizacional
Como Citar
Resumo
Este artigo apresenta uma análise conceitual do Programa Internacional de Avaliação de Alunos (PISA), da OCDE, sob a perspectiva da sociologia organizacional. Com base em uma revisão narrativa da literatura, o artigo explora fatores subjacentes à atual proeminência do PISA, utilizando conceitos derivados das abordagens de sistemas racionais, eficiência social e neoinstitucionalismo. A partir da análise de seus fundamentos implícitos, lógicas de operação e impactos, a principal conclusão é que o poder e as limitações do PISA funcionam como um espelho, que reflete aspectos do desenho do programa e de características da OCDE, mobilizados por apoiadores e críticos em direções opostas. Dado o apelo do PISA junto aos decisores políticos, o artigo sugere o aprofundamento de pesquisas que possam revelar seu potencial para a aprendizagem transcultural, em vez de reforçá-lo como uma ferramenta global de accountability e padronização.
Referências
Addey, C. (2021). Passports to the Global South, UN flags, favourite experts: Understanding the interplay between UNESCO and the OECD within the SDG4 context. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 0(0), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2020.1862643
Andrews, P., & et al. (2014, May 6). OECD and Pisa tests are damaging education worldwide. The Guardian, 6 May. http://www.theguardian.com/education/2014/may/06/oecd-pisa-tests-damaging-education-academics
Auld, E., Xiaomin, L., & Morris, P. (2020). Piloting PISA for Development to success: An analysis of its findings, framework and recommendations. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 0(0), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2020.1852914
Davies, S., & Zarifa, D. (2009). New institutional theory and the Weberian tradition. In C. Levine-Rasky (Ed.), Canadian perspectives on the sociology of education (pp. 3–12). Oxford University Press.
Davis, G., & Scott, W. R. (2015). Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural and Open Systems Perspectives. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315663371
Fischman, G. E., Topper, A. M., Silova, I., Goebel, J., & Holloway, J. L. (2019). Examining the influence of international large-scale assessments on national education policies. Journal of Education Policy, 34(4), 470–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2018.1460493
Gorur, R. (2016). Seeing like PISA: A cautionary tale about the performativity of international assessments. European Educational Research Journal, 15(5), 598–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116658299
Grey, S., & Morris, P. (2023). Educational accountability, international large scale assessments and PISA: Powerful influences based on weak foundations. In R. J. Tierney, F. Rizvi, & K. Ercikan (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (Fourth Edition) (pp. 181–191). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.09062-X
Hopfenbeck, T. N., Lenkeit, J., El Masri, Y., Cantrell, K., Ryan, J., & Baird, J. A. (2018). Lessons Learned from PISA: A Systematic Review of Peer-Reviewed Articles on the Programme for International Student Assessment. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(3), 333–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1258726
Jabbar, H., & Menashy, F. (2022). Economic Imperialism in Education Research: A Conceptual Review. Educational Researcher, 51(4), 279–288. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211066114
Jakobi, A. P., & Martens, K. (2010). Expanding and Intensifying Governance: The OECD in Education Policy. In Mechanisms of OECD Governance. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591145.001.0001
Kamens, D. H. (2013). Globalization and the emergence of an audit culture: PISA and the search for “best practices” and magic bullets. In H.-D. Meyer & A. Benavot (Eds.), PISA, Power, and Policy (pp. 117–140). Symposium Books.
Klees, S. J. (2016). Human capital and rates of return: Brilliant ideas or ideological dead ends? Comparative Education Review, 60(4), 644–672. https://doi.org/10.1086/688063
Komatsu, H., & Rappleye, J. (2017). A new global policy regime founded on invalid statistics? Hanushek, Woessmann, PISA, and economic growth. Comparative Education, 53(2), 166–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2017.1300008
Labaree, D. F. (2014). Let’s measure what no one teaches: PISA, NCLB, and the shrinking aims of education. Teachers College Record, 116(9), 1–14.
Lewis, S. (2019). Historicizing New Spaces and Relations of the OECD’s Global Educational Governance: PISA for Schools and PISA4U. In C. Ydesen (Ed.), The OECD’s Historical Rise in Education: The formation of a global governing complex (pp. 269–289). Palgrave Macmillan.
Martens, K., & Wolf, K. D. (2009). Boomerangs and Trojan Horses: The Unintended Consequences of Internationalising Education Policy Through the EU and the OECD. In A. Amaral, G. Neave, C. Musselin, & P. Maassen (Eds.), European Integration and the Governance of Higher Education and Research (pp. 81–107). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9505-4_4
McGaw, B. (2008). The role of the OECD in international comparative studies of achievement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 15(3), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940802417384
MEC. (2019). Pisa 2018 revela baixo desempenho escolar em Leitura , Matemática e Ciências no Brasil. Ministério da Educação. http://portal.mec.gov.br/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=83191:pisa-2018-revela-baixo-desempenho-escolar-em-leitura-matematica-e-ciencias-no-brasil&catid=211&Itemid=86
Mehta, J. (2013). The allure of order: High hopes, dashed expectations, and the troubled quest to remake American schooling. Oxford University Press.
Mehta, J., & Peterson, A. (2019). International learning communities: What happens when leaders seek to learn across national boundaries? Journal of Educational Change, 20(3), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-019-09348-0
Meyer, H.-D. (2014). Imagining PISA’s policy futures: A postscript and some extensions to the open letter to andreas schleicher. Policy Futures in Education, 12(7), 883–892. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2014.12.7.883
Meyer, H.-D., & Benavot, A. (2013). PISA and the Globalization of Education Governance: Some puzzles and problems. In H.-Di. Meyer & A. Benavot (Eds.), PISA, Power, and Policy (Oxford Stu, pp. 9–26). Symposium Books.
Mundy, K., Green, A., Lingard, B., & Verger, A. (2016). Introduction: The globalization of education policy – Key approaches and debates. In The Handbook of Global Education Policy (pp. 1–20). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118468005.ch0
Niemann, D., & Martens, K. (2015). Monitoring Standards of Education Worldwide: PISA and its consequences. In M. Hayden, J. Levy, & J. Thompson (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Research in International Education (2nd ed., pp. 488–497). Sage Publications.
Niemann, D., & Martens, K. (2018). Soft governance by hard fact? The OECD as a knowledge broker in education policy. Global Social Policy, 18(3), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018118794076
OECD. (n.d.). PISA for Schools—PISA. Retrieved January 3, 2024, from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-for-schools/
OECD. (2011). Lessons from PISA for the United States: Strong Performers and Successful Reformers in Education. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2018a). PISA for Development: Results in focus (91; PISA in Focus). OECD.
OECD. (2018b). Programme for International Student Assessment. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/
Ozga, J. (2023). Accountability in an age of international testing. In R. J. Tierney, F. Rizvi, & K. Ercikan (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (Fourth Edition) (pp. 306–312). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.09054-0
Rivas, A., & Scasso, M. G. (2019). Low stakes, high risks: The problem of intertemporal validity of PISA in Latin America. Journal of Education Policy, 00(00), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2019.1696987
Schiro, M. (2013). Social Efficiency Ideology. In Curriculum Theory: Conflicting Visions and Enduring Concerns (2nd ed., pp. 57–98).
Schleicher, A. (2014, May 8). Pisa programme not about short-term fixes. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2014/may/08/pisa-programme-short-term-fixes#:~:text=The%20letter%20by%20Dr%20Heinz,operation%20and%20Development's%20Pisa%20programme.
Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018: Insights and interpretations.
Scott, J. C. (2020). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/doi:10.12987/9780300252989
Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2014). The OECD and the expansion of PISA: New global modes of governance in education. British Educational Research Journal, 40(6), 917–936. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3120
Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2019). Conclusions: What Policy-Makers Do with PISA The Power of Soft Power. In F. Waldow & G. Steiner-Khamsi (Eds.), Understanding PISA’s Attractiveness: Critical Analyses in Comparative Policy Studies. Bloomsbury Academic. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350057319
Waldow, F. (2017). Projecting images of the ‘good’ and the ‘bad school’: Top scorers in educational large-scale assessments as reference societies. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 47(5), 647–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2016.1262245
Wiseman, A. (2013). Policy responses to PISA in comparative perspective. In H.-D. Meyer & A. Benavot (Eds.), PISA, Power, and Policy (pp. 303–322). Symposium Books.
Zhao, Y. (2020). Two decades of havoc: A synthesis of criticism against PISA. Journal of Educational Change, 21(2), 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-019-09367-x
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Tatiana Feitosa de Britto
