Abstract
In Brazilian patterns of collaboration and rivalry between scientific disciplines, themes monopolized by Political Science and Sociology gradually tend to become the object of historians. Would it be possible for this thematic migration to occur in such a way that researchers ignore each other (in denser scientific production spaces, for example, where it becomes impossible to follow production around a subject and do not yet have current handbooks in)? We are far from that.
References
RODRIGUES, Lidiane Soares. A miséria da historiografia: uma crítica ao revisionismo contemporâneo. Crítica Marxista, Campinas, SP, v. 24, n. 44, p. 183–185, 2017. https://doi.org/10.53000/cma.v24i44.19153
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2017 Lidiane Soares Rodrigues