Analysis, comparison and assessment of the behavior of malware and goodware
PDF

Palavras-chave

Malware analysis
Program tracing
Computer security

Como Citar

BERTÃO, Giovanni; GEUS, Paulo de. Analysis, comparison and assessment of the behavior of malware and goodware. Revista dos Trabalhos de Iniciação Científica da UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, n. 27, p. 1–1, 2019. DOI: 10.20396/revpibic2720192100. Disponível em: https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/eventos/index.php/pibic/article/view/2100. Acesso em: 29 mar. 2024.

Resumo

Most software installed in current user's machines were obtained from public software repositores, which are responsible for million downloads everyday. Whereas practical, the reliance on this type of service might render users susceptible to downloading infected software to their machines. In this work, we investigated the prevalence of malicious software on public software repositories, thus assessing Internet users security. We discovered that up to 33.5% of software available in multiple repositories were flagged as malicious by at least one antivirus.

https://doi.org/10.20396/revpibic2720192100
PDF

Referências

Botacin, M; Grégio, A e de Geus, P. “The other guys: automated analysis ofmarginalized malware,” Journal of Computer Virology and HackingTechniques, pp. 1–12, 2017. [Online]. Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11416-017-0292-8.
Bertão, G; Botacin, M; Grégio, A e de Geus, P. “Large scale studies: Malwareneedles in a haystack,” in Anais Estendidos do XVIII Simpósio Brasileiro emSegurança da Informação e de Sistemas Computacionais. Porto Alegre, RS,Brasil: SBC, 2018, pp. 203–212. [Online]. Available:http://portaldeconteudo.sbc.org.br/index.php/sbseg_estendido/article/view/4159

Todos os trabalhos são de acesso livre, sendo que a detenção dos direitos concedidos aos trabalhos são de propriedade da Revista dos Trabalhos de Iniciação Científica da UNICAMP.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.