Topical anesthetic efficacy on palatal mucosa pretreated with microneedles
PDF

Palavras-chave

Microneedles
Topival anesthetic
Oral mucosa

Como Citar

AUGUSTO, Gabriela; LEITE, Michelle; SANTOS, Stephany; MOREIRA, Nádia; ABDALLA, Henrique; VOLPATO, Maria; GILL, Harvinder; GROPPO, Francisco. Topical anesthetic efficacy on palatal mucosa pretreated with microneedles . Revista dos Trabalhos de Iniciação Científica da UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, n. 27, p. 1–1, 2019. DOI: 10.20396/revpibic2720191634. Disponível em: https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/eventos/index.php/pibic/article/view/1634. Acesso em: 29 mar. 2024.

Resumo

This research evaluated whether topical anesthetic efficacy increases on palatal mucosa pretreated with microneedles. In this crossover, randomized, double-blind study, 20 male volunteers were submitted to topical application of microneedles or flat patches on palatal mucosa, bilaterally in the canine region followed by topical anesthesia procedure with EMLA® (Eutectic mixture of lidocaine and prilocaine) during 2 or 5 minutes. Immediately after, an infiltrative anesthesia was performed by using a 30-gauge short needle and 0.3 mL of lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1:100,000. Pain sensation during needle insertion and local anesthetic injection was evaluated by using 2 different visual analogical scale (VAS). VAS (in mm) results were submitted to the Mann-Whitney test (? = 5%). The use of microneedle as a pretreatment of palatal mucosa did not increase topical anesthetic efficacy of EMLA in reducing pain during needle insertion or local anesthetic injection after 2 min of topical application. However the efficacy of EMLA after 5 minutes of application resulted in reduction of pain during needle insertion, but not to local anesthetic injection (p>0.05). In conclusion, microneedle treatment of palatal mucosa was able to increase topical anesthetic efficacy of EMLA®.

https://doi.org/10.20396/revpibic2720191634
PDF

Referências

AL-MELH, M. A. & ANDERSSON, L. (2007). Comparison of topical anesthetics (EMLA/Oraqix vs. benzocaine) on pain experienced during palatal needle injection. — Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 103, e16-20.

AL-MELH, M. A. & ANDERSSON, L. (2008). Reducing pain from palatal needle stick by topical anesthetics: a comparative study between two lidocaine/prilocaine substances. — J Clin Dent 19, 43-7.

ARMFIELD, J. M. & MILGROM, P. (2011). A clinician guide to patients afraid of dental injections and numbness. — SAAD Dig 27, 33-9.

BAL, S. M., CAUSSIN, J., PAVEL, S. & BOUWSTRA, J. A. (2008). In vivo assessment of safety of microneedle arrays in human skin. — Eur J Pharm Sci 35, 193-202.

BARIYA, S. H., GOHEL, M. C., MEHTA, T. A. & SHARMA, O. P. (2012). Microneedles: an emerging transdermal drug delivery system. — J Pharm Pharmacol 64, 11-29.

CORMIER, M., JOHNSON, B., AMERI, M., NYAM, K., LIBIRAN, L., ZHANG, D. D. & DADDONA, P. (2004). Transdermal delivery of desmopressin using a coated microneedle array patch system. — J Control Release 97, 503-11.

FRANZ-MONTAN, M., DE PAULA, E., GROPPO, F. C., SILVA, A. L., RANALI, J. & VOLPATO, M. C. (2010a). Liposome-encapsulated ropivacaine for intraoral topical anesthesia. — Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 110, 800-4.

FRANZ-MONTAN, M., DE PAULA, E., GROPPO, F. C., SILVA, A. L., RANALI, J. & VOLPATO, M. C.. (2012a). Liposomal delivery system for topical anaesthesia of the palatal mucosa. — Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50, 60-4.

FRANZ-MONTAN, M., DE PAULA, E., GROPPO, F. C., SILVA, A. L. R., RANALI, J. & VOLPATO, M. C. (2012b). Liposomal delivery system for topical anaesthesia of the palatal mucosa. — British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 50, 60-64.

Todos os trabalhos são de acesso livre, sendo que a detenção dos direitos concedidos aos trabalhos são de propriedade da Revista dos Trabalhos de Iniciação Científica da UNICAMP.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.